Post by account_disabled on Feb 14, 2024 9:35:22 GMT
Aof the punishment and is reflected in the nature duration and manner of its execution. In the same sense the jurisprudence held that the court when assessing the conduct of the convicted person must refer to the period of time in which he is serving the custodial sentence because only in this way can the role be reached of the punishment and the measure of the fulfillment of its functions can be followed. In the same way it was wellfounded that the seriousness of the facts for which the person was convicted was automatically reflected in the fraction that the convicted person had to serve and at the time of the pronouncement on the conditional release the way in which he understood to be prevailed refer to the conditions of detention.
Equally the invocation of the risk to which society is exposed in the Congo Email List case of the conditional release of persons convicted of crimes of a certain nature or of high gravity cannot per se substantiate a decision in this matter. minutes drawn up by the Commission for the individualization of the regime for the execution of custodial sentences within the penitentiary those regarding the number of procedural cycles of conditional release that the convicted person is in the state of recidivism the measure in that the compliance with the prison rules and the existence of the rewards granted to the person in question have been achieved.
I appreciate that the number of procedural cycles of conditional release that the convicted person went through can be relevant from case to case but this aspect cannot be retained per se as a sufficient argument in the sense of rejecting this benefit. The reiteration or renewal of the request proposal for conditional release is relevant from the perspective of the fact that the fulfillment of the legal conditions will always be reported at the time.
Equally the invocation of the risk to which society is exposed in the Congo Email List case of the conditional release of persons convicted of crimes of a certain nature or of high gravity cannot per se substantiate a decision in this matter. minutes drawn up by the Commission for the individualization of the regime for the execution of custodial sentences within the penitentiary those regarding the number of procedural cycles of conditional release that the convicted person is in the state of recidivism the measure in that the compliance with the prison rules and the existence of the rewards granted to the person in question have been achieved.
I appreciate that the number of procedural cycles of conditional release that the convicted person went through can be relevant from case to case but this aspect cannot be retained per se as a sufficient argument in the sense of rejecting this benefit. The reiteration or renewal of the request proposal for conditional release is relevant from the perspective of the fact that the fulfillment of the legal conditions will always be reported at the time.