Post by account_disabled on Feb 14, 2024 9:35:34 GMT
Aof resolving the request or proposal. The conclusion is that by the number of procedural cycles of conditional release nothing else is followed other than the behavior of the convicted person during the execution of the sentence but it is about the most recent behavior which can change the previous conviction of the court regarding the achievement of a sufficient level of guidance and social reintegration. Regarding the state of recidivism jurisprudence emphasizes that the existence of criminal antecedents does not ipso facto represent a reason for rejecting the request for conditional release and the situation of the convict must be rigorously analyzed to attest to his perseverance in work and special behavior.
Finally the fundamental proofs of correction as I have shown derive Mali Email List from the good behavior of the convict in any circumstance during the execution of the sentence from the conscientious performance of any duties but also from circumstances other than those related to the performance of work if these they concern the correction of the convicted person from a moral point of view. In the end A final argument that this paper proposes to analyze is the one related to the functions and purpose of the punishment to which the person who requests or is proposed for conditional release was sentenced.
Jurisprudence considers the amount of the punishment to be as a rule the amount necessary to be executed in full in order to realize all the functions of the punishment and for it to achieve its purpose. I think it is important to underline the fact that this should not lead to the inefficiency of the conditional release institution because the solution must be individualized for each individual convict. Both the function of coercion and the role of exemplification are realized mainly by sentencing to a custodial sentence the resonance of which in most cases is sufficient to prevent the commission of such acts.
Finally the fundamental proofs of correction as I have shown derive Mali Email List from the good behavior of the convict in any circumstance during the execution of the sentence from the conscientious performance of any duties but also from circumstances other than those related to the performance of work if these they concern the correction of the convicted person from a moral point of view. In the end A final argument that this paper proposes to analyze is the one related to the functions and purpose of the punishment to which the person who requests or is proposed for conditional release was sentenced.
Jurisprudence considers the amount of the punishment to be as a rule the amount necessary to be executed in full in order to realize all the functions of the punishment and for it to achieve its purpose. I think it is important to underline the fact that this should not lead to the inefficiency of the conditional release institution because the solution must be individualized for each individual convict. Both the function of coercion and the role of exemplification are realized mainly by sentencing to a custodial sentence the resonance of which in most cases is sufficient to prevent the commission of such acts.